Understanding avoidants

Why avoidants pull away when things get close

By Alexis Friedlander, MSc · Updated · 7 min read

Not sure what your pattern is? Take the free attachment style quiz.

The pattern you keep seeing

You have a lovely few days. They are warm, open, maybe more affectionate than they have ever been. Then, within a day or two, something shuts.

Replies get short. Plans get vague. They need "space", or they start an argument about something small.

If you are anxiously attached, your mind goes straight to one question. What did I do?

In most cases, nothing. I was dismissive-avoidant for most of my adult life, and I saw it as a strength. I have also spent seven years working with people on your side of this. The pulling away is rarely a verdict on you. It is a reaction to how close things got.

What is deactivation, and why does closeness trigger it?

Everyone has an attachment system. Think of it as the part of you that reaches for a person you love when you are stressed, scared or in need.

For most people, getting closer calms that system down. For an avoidant person, it tends to do the opposite.

The leading explanation starts in childhood. In early home observations, the mothers of avoidant infants tended to reject or ignore their babies' bids for comfort when the babies were upset. The child's solution is clever. Stop reaching. Turn the need down. Rely on yourself.

Deactivation is the adult version of that. In plain words, it means turning down the volume on your own need for closeness, and on anything that stirs it up. One caution: the childhood link is a theory built from infant studies. It is not proven for every avoidant adult.

Two things are worth knowing.

  • Avoidant people do want closeness. In their review of the research, Robin Edelstein and Phillip Shaver conclude that avoidant adults want closeness and intimacy like anyone else. They keep a protective distance so they do not feel vulnerable or get rejected.
  • You often cannot see it when things are easy. The same review notes that under low stress, avoidant and non-avoidant people often look the same. The defences show up when attachment is on the line.

That second point explains a lot. Early dating is low risk. Nobody depends on anybody yet. As things deepen, the stakes rise. They start to need you, and you start to need them. That is the exact situation their system was built to avoid.

What research shows about the moment they pull back

In 1992, Jeffry Simpson and his colleagues brought 83 dating couples into a lab. Each woman was told she was about to do something that makes most people anxious. Then the couple was left in a waiting room for five minutes and filmed discreetly.

Secure and avoidant people behaved differently. As their anxiety rose, the more avoidant women sought less support from their partner. As their partner's anxiety rose, the more avoidant men offered less support.

So the distance grew at the moment the need was highest. That is the opposite of what you do, which is why it feels so baffling.

The limits matter. This was one study, with dating couples, one stressful situation and five minutes of film. It was about fear, not about a happy weekend. But it shows the direction of the reflex: when need goes up, an avoidant person tends to move away from the person they need.

Calm on the outside, busy on the inside

From where you stand, it can look like they simply do not care. The evidence is more mixed than that.

  • They can switch it off. Chris Fraley and Phillip Shaver asked adults to push away thoughts of their partner leaving them. Dismissing-avoidant adults could do it. The thoughts became harder to reach and their bodies calmed down.
  • The body can tell another story. Lisa Diamond's team measured skin conductance in 148 adults. That is tiny changes in sweat on the skin, a standard sign of stress. During stress tasks and talks about attachment topics, higher avoidance went with stronger bodily reactions, more so in women. On one task, avoidant people's bodies showed more stress than they said they felt.
  • The switch fails under pressure. Mario Mikulincer's team found that avoidant people could keep thoughts of a breakup away. When they also had to hold a seven-digit number in mind, the thoughts came back, along with negative views of themselves.

These studies do not line up perfectly, and all three are lab tasks. Put together, they suggest this. Avoidant people are good at turning attachment feelings down. It takes effort. Under enough load, it stops working.

What none of this can tell you is what your partner is feeling tonight. No study can.

Why did they go cold after a great weekend?

No study has followed couples home after a great weekend and measured what happens on Monday. So I am joining dots here, and you should know that.

A great weekend is a lot of closeness in a short time. Long talks, affection, maybe "I love you", maybe plans for the future. For you, that fills the tank. For an avoidant partner, the same weekend raises how much they need you, and need is the trigger.

One finding fits. In the research Edelstein and Shaver review, people did exercises designed to build closeness by sharing personal things. Avoidant people came out feeling less close to the other person than non-avoidant people did.

So the cold spell is most likely their system turning the volume back down. That is why it can follow your best days and not your worst ones. I will go deeper on the weekend version in its own article.

Why the fights before anniversaries, trips and milestones?

Again, nobody has counted arguments in the week before an anniversary. Research cannot give you a number.

But milestones share one thing. An anniversary, a holiday together, meeting the family, moving in. Each one says the same sentence: we are getting more serious, and more is expected of you. For someone who protects their independence, that is pressure.

We do know something about how avoidant people react to pressure. Nickola Overall and her colleagues filmed 180 couples while one partner asked the other to change something. The more avoidant partners responded with more anger and more withdrawal.

A fight before a milestone may be doing a similar job. It creates distance at the moment closeness was due. They do not have to plan it for it to work that way.

One clear line. If you are afraid for your safety, or there is control, threats or violence, that is not an attachment problem and it needs specialist support.

How your reaction and theirs feed each other

When they pull back, your alarm goes off. You text more. You ask what is wrong. You ask again. From your side, that is love and worry. From their side, it lands as more pressure, and you have just seen what pressure does.

The Overall study had a second finding. Anger and withdrawal dropped in the moments when the other partner respected the avoidant person's independence and showed them they were valued.

I am not handing you that as a technique for keeping someone. It is a finding about how hard conversations go, in couples where both people had agreed to sit down and talk. It cannot make a person want closeness. What it does show is that pushing harder is the move least likely to get you what you want.

What to do when it happens

  1. Calm yourself first. In my method this stage is called Calm. Before you send anything, settle your own body. Walk, eat, sleep, talk to a friend. A message written in panic asks them to fix your alarm, and that is not their job.
  2. Say one clear thing, once. Something like: "I noticed you went quiet after the weekend. I would like to talk about it this week. When suits you?" Then stop. No follow-ups, no hints, no silence used as punishment.
  3. Ask for a time frame, not a reason. Space with a return time is workable. "I need a couple of days, let's talk on Thursday" is very different from open-ended silence. You are allowed to ask which one this is.
  4. Watch what they do next. In my method this is Expose. Stop decoding and start observing. Do they come back? Can they talk about what happened, even clumsily? Does the same thing happen after every close moment? Write down actions, not theories.
  5. Decide on what you can see. Understanding deactivation explains the behaviour. It does not mean you have to live with it. Wanting closeness that stays is a normal need, and you get to decide whether this relationship can meet it.

Master your attachment, you master your relationships.

Common questions

Does pulling away mean they have lost feelings for me?

Not necessarily. The research suggests avoidant people often turn feelings down when closeness rises, and that takes effort. But I cannot tell you what your partner feels, and neither can any study. Their behaviour over the next few weeks will tell you more than any theory.

How long will they stay distant?

Research cannot tell you that. No study has timed it, and anyone who gives you a number of days is guessing. What you can do is ask for a time frame and see whether they keep to it.

Should I give them space or reach out?

Both, in a small way. Send one calm, clear message so they know where you stand, then leave room. Chasing adds pressure. Going silent to make a point is a game, and it will not show you who they are.

Can an avoidant person change?

Yes. I was dismissive-avoidant for years and I am secure now. But the change has to be theirs. You cannot do it for them, and waiting for it is not a plan.

Not sure what your pattern is?

Take the free attachment style quiz and see what is driving the dynamic between you.

Take the quiz

References

  • Diamond, L. M., Hicks, A. M., & Otter-Henderson, K. (2006). Physiological evidence for repressive coping among avoidantly attached adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(2), 205-229. doi.org/10.1177/0265407506062470
  • Edelstein, R. S., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Avoidant attachment: Exploration of an oxymoron. In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1997). Adult attachment and the suppression of unwanted thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 1080-1091. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1080
  • Mikulincer, M., Dolev, T., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment-related strategies during thought suppression: Ironic rebounds and vulnerable self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 940-956. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.940
  • Overall, N. C., Simpson, J. A., & Struthers, H. (2013). Buffering attachment-related avoidance: Softening emotional and behavioral defenses during conflict discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 854-871. doi.org/10.1037/a0031798
  • Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Nelligan, J. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 434-446. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.434

Related articles