Talking to an avoidant

How to respond when an avoidant reaches out

By Alexis Friedlander, MSc · Updated · 5 min read

Want a direct read on your situation? See the Diagnostic.

What does "hey, hope you're well" mean after weeks of silence?

It means you crossed their mind and they acted on it. That is all a message like this can tell you.

It does not tell you they have changed, that they are sorry, or that they want the relationship back. It might be the start of that. It might be a lonely Sunday evening. Research cannot tell you which, and neither can I from one line of text.

So stop trying to decode it. Four words cannot carry the weight you are putting on them. What they do next will tell you far more.

Before you type anything, check your state

You saw their name and your body reacted. Racing heart, tight stomach, hope and anger at the same time. That is your attachment system switching on, and it is a bad state to write from.

Replies written in that state tend to go one of two ways. A long, warm message that acts as if nothing happened. Or a sharp one, meant to make them feel what you felt. Both are attempts to get rid of the feeling fast.

Contact itself also has a cost. David Sbarra and Robert Emery followed 58 young adults after a breakup, using an emotions diary over 28 days. For those who stayed in contact with their ex, love and sadness faded more slowly. It is a small study, and it cannot prove that contact caused the slower recovery. But it is a fair warning that one message can stir everything up again.

So wait. An hour, a night, a couple of days. A message that took them weeks to send can wait until you are steady. In my method this is the Calm stage, and it comes first for a reason.

Decide what you want, then write the reply

There is no single correct reply, because the reply depends on what you want. Pick one of three aims before you write a word. The examples below are there to adapt. Put them in your own words.

If you want to reconnect: "Hi. Good to hear from you. I'm doing well. I'd be open to meeting for a coffee and talking properly. Would next week suit you?"

If you want clarity: "Hi. Thanks for getting in touch. I'd rather not do small talk as if nothing happened. I would like to understand what happened between us. Are you open to a call this week?"

If you want to close the door: "Thanks for the message. I hope you're well too. I've decided it's better for me not to stay in touch, so I won't be replying again. Take care."

Notice what all three share. They are short. They do not punish ("Oh, so now you remember I exist"). They do not plead ("I've missed you so much, I knew you'd come back"). And each one says clearly what you want.

You are also allowed not to reply at all. Silence is a valid answer, especially if every round of contact sets you back.

Why short and low-pressure works, and where it stops

Nickola Overall and her colleagues filmed 180 couples while one partner tried to get the other to change something. The more avoidant partners reacted with more anger and more withdrawal. But when the person asking respected their independence and showed that they valued them, the anger and withdrawal dropped, and the discussions went better.

Those were couples talking face to face in a lab. They were not exes texting after a silence. Still, the principle is worth borrowing. Pressure tends to make an avoidant person pull back. Room to choose makes it easier for them to stay in the conversation.

Low-pressure does not mean hiding what you need. In an earlier study, Overall's team filmed 61 couples and then followed them for a year. Being direct about what you wanted felt less successful in the moment, yet it predicted more change over the next twelve months. Softer, indirect approaches felt better at the time and did not predict later change. That study looked at couples in general, not avoidant partners in particular.

Put the two together. Be warm in tone and clear in content. "Are you open to a proper conversation?" is direct, and it leaves them free to say no. If you want a real conversation, ask for one.

What to watch for after you reply

Your reply is a small test of reality. In my method this is the Expose stage. You act, then you watch what the other person does, and you stop guessing at what they feel.

Watch for four things:

  • Follow-through. If they agree to a call or a coffee, does it happen?
  • Responsibility. Do they say anything about the silence, or about their part in what went wrong, without you dragging it out of them?
  • Their response to a direct ask. When you ask for a proper conversation, do they engage, go vague, or disappear?
  • Your own state. Are you calmer after contact with them, or back to checking your phone every ten minutes?

One warm text is not evidence. A pattern is.

Joanne, 44, had been through four breakups with the same man. Each time he came back with a warm message, and each time she answered within minutes. The fifth time she waited two days, replied in one line, and asked to talk on the phone. He said yes, then went quiet for a week. For the first time she counted what he did, not what he wrote, and the answer was plain. Composite example; details changed.

One caution. If contact with this person brings fear for your safety, control, threats or violence, that is not an attachment problem, and it needs specialist support.

What to do, step by step

  1. Do not reply straight away. Put the phone down. Move, eat, sleep, talk to a friend.
  2. Make an if-then plan. Psychologist Peter Gollwitzer reviewed a body of studies in which people who decided in advance "if X happens, then I will do Y" followed through far more often than people who only set a goal. Those studies were about tasks like finishing a project or taking exercise, not about texting an ex, but the tool transfers. Yours might be: "If they message, then I wait until the next morning to answer."
  3. Choose one aim. Reconnect, get clarity, or close the door.
  4. Send a short reply that says it. Three or four sentences. No punishment, no pleading, and a clear ask if you have one.
  5. Watch what they do, then decide. Give it long enough to see a pattern, not one good evening. Then decide what you do with what you can see.

Master your attachment, you master your relationships.

Common questions

Should I wait as long as they did before replying?

No. Matching their silence is a quiet way of punishing them, and it keeps you busy playing a game. Wait until you are calm and you know what you want, whether that takes an hour or a week.

Will a direct reply scare them off?

It might. A calm, clear ask can be too much for someone who is not ready for a real conversation. If one plain sentence ends the contact, you have learned what was on offer.

What if they reply warmly and then go quiet again?

Then you have your answer about follow-through, at least for now. You can ask once, clearly, for what you want. After that, what they do is the reply.

Want a direct read on your situation?

Bring your situation to one private session and get Alexis's perspective on where things stand.

Explore the Diagnostic

References

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.
  • Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 620-639. doi.org/10.1037/a0012961
  • Overall, N. C., Simpson, J. A., & Struthers, H. (2013). Buffering attachment-related avoidance: Softening emotional and behavioral defenses during conflict discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 854-871. doi.org/10.1037/a0031798
  • Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213-232. doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00112.x

Related articles